13:04:26	 From Jacek Malec : Good afternoon. We start in 10 minutes
13:20:01	 From Jacek Malec : (2 * 3) + 4
13:20:10	 From Jacek Malec : 2 * (3 + 4)
13:35:28	 From Hannes : Since it says "statement" rather than "statements" in e.g. the if-then-else block does that mean that we only allow a single statement in those blocks? Is it so as well in the while-do blocks?
13:36:28	 From Avery : is expr defined somewhere? or is that a part of the language this is defined in?
13:46:46	 From sanctified : isn't do notation handy here
13:48:49	 From sanctified : If I'm following here, because of their monadic structure these parsers can be "chained", correct?
13:58:55	 From Karl Hallsby : In many, could we have switched return [] with failure?
14:00:10	 From Kåre : why do we use lists to represent failures? Could we not use Maybe with the same effect?
14:01:04	 From Kåre : Yeah, reasonable. Thanks
14:01:17	 From Karl Hallsby : I'm still confused by >>=. Could you explain it again?
14:08:52	 From sanctified : @christian your mic is on
14:08:52	 From Hannes : Christian you might want to mute your microphone
14:32:36	 From sanctified : could all these case [] ->[] case [(v, out)] -> ... constructs not just be replaced with map (v, out) -> ...?
14:45:30	 From Jacek Malec : map :: [(a,String)] -> [(b,String)] -> [(a,String)]->…
14:47:00	 From Nicholas Boyd Isacsson : Bye! Thanks for today